R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 28) [2018] NSWSC 87
The application was refused because the proximity to Gattellari's trial was not such as to make the order necessary to prevent prejudice; any prejudice was speculative, sufficient time would elapse for the fade factor to operate, jurors can be relied upon to follow directions, and suggested divergence in evidence was speculative. Accordingly, the necessity for a non-publication order was not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Non Publication Order—ruling
- Outcome
- Application for non-publication order dismissed; interim order vacated.
- Legal Topics
- ['non Publication Orders' 'suppression Orders' 'open Justice' 'prejudice to Administration of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Non Publication Order—ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a non-publication order should be made to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice concerning evidence to be given by a witness who is to stand trial on related charges']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the proximity to Gattellari's trial was not such as to make the order necessary to prevent prejudice; any prejudice was speculative, sufficient time would elapse for the fade factor to operate, jurors can be relied upon to follow directions, and suggested divergence in evidence was speculative. Accordingly, the necessity for a non-publication order was not established.
Court Disposition
Application for non-publication order dismissed; interim order vacated.
Orders
- ['I vacate the interim non-publication order which was made on 8 February 2018.' 'I dismiss the application.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment