Forty Twenty Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2005] NSWLEC 117
The proposal's relationship to the adjoining properties and its future context is unacceptable due to inadequate setbacks, bulk, and amenity, failing to achieve compatibility with its context and sufficient levels of solar access. Development consent is therefore refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed, development application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['existing Use Rights' 'compatibility With Character' 'residential Amenity' 'solar Access']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal is compatible with the existing and future character of the area' 'Whether the proposal provides acceptable amenity to adjoining residents and future occupants, particularly solar access']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal's relationship to the adjoining properties and its future context is unacceptable due to inadequate setbacks, bulk, and amenity, failing to achieve compatibility with its context and sufficient levels of solar access. Development consent is therefore refused.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed, development application refused
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The development application (200400622) to demolish the existing dwelling house and carry out alterations to the existing shops and construction of one shop top dwelling and four two-storey dwellings over basement car parking for seven vehicles and two off street parking spaces, at 246...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment