Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 1009
Development consent granted subject to deletion of top storeys which contravene maximum permitted height and gross floor area standards; appropriate conditions imposed to resolve amenity, privacy, and traffic concerns; variation of development standards not justified by sufficient planning grounds under cl 4.6.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'mixed Use Development' 'building Height' 'floor Space Ratio' 'consent Authority Powers' 'variation of Development Standards']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proposed development constitutes overdevelopment' 'Whether proposal complies with height and gross floor area standards' 'Whether variation to development standard is justified' 'Whether proposal is consistent with desired streetscape character and urban form' 'Consideration of public interest and objector submissions']
Ratio Decidendi
Development consent granted subject to deletion of top storeys which contravene maximum permitted height and gross floor area standards; appropriate conditions imposed to resolve amenity, privacy, and traffic concerns; variation of development standards not justified by sufficient planning grounds under cl 4.6.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Development application No 17.2014.3 approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibits returned except for exhibits 1, 4, 9, B and C.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment