Fox v Burvill [1955] HCA 50

Fox v Burvill [1955] HCA 50

The appellant was not a 'widow' entitled to apply under the Testator's Family Maintenance Act because at the time of the testator's death, she was not receiving maintenance by direct order of the court but from a trust created by private deed, even though the arrangement was approved by the court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
["testator's Family Maintenance" 'definition of Widow' 'divorce Maintenance' 'entitlement to Maintenance']
['succession Law' 'family Law'] ["testator's Family Maintenance" 'definition of Widow' 'divorce Maintenance' 'entitlement to Maintenance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether a divorced wife who receives maintenance by deed and trust is a 'widow' under s.2 of the Testator's Family Maintenance Act 1939-1944 (W.A.)" "Whether the payments to the appellant were 'by order of the court' within the meaning of the Act"]

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was not a 'widow' entitled to apply under the Testator's Family Maintenance Act because at the time of the testator's death, she was not receiving maintenance by direct order of the court but from a trust created by private deed, even though the arrangement was approved by the court.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed.' 'Costs of all parties represented before the Court on the appeal to be paid out of the estate.']