Foxground Property Investments Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2017] NSWLEC 1172
The Court is required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement following the conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Foxground Property Investments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Georges River Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted; leave to rely on amended plans; costs order as agreed or assessed
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Childcare Centre, Conciliation Conference, Development Consent, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Foxground Property Investments Pty Ltd
Applicant
Georges River Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amended development application for childcare centre meets statutory requirements
- 2 Whether development consent should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement following the conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted; leave to rely on amended plans; costs order as agreed or assessed
Orders
- The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans referred to in condition 1 of the Draft Conditions of Consent at Annexure A.
- The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to Section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment