FQH17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1771

FQH17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1771

The appeal was dismissed because there was no evidence to support any of the appellant's grounds, no denial of procedural fairness, no jurisdictional error by the Authority or the primary judge, no error regarding legal representation or publication of reasons, and no demonstrated bias.

Parties
Appellant: FQH17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed, application for adjournment dismissed, costs awarded to first respondent.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Safe Haven Enterprise Visa, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdictional Error, Bias
Migration Administrative Law Human Rights Judicial Review Safe Haven Enterprise Visa Procedural Fairness Jurisdictional Error Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FQH17

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Immigration Assessment Authority

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether appellant was denied procedural fairness
  2. 2 Whether there was jurisdictional error by the Immigration Assessment Authority
  3. 3 Whether primary judge erred in dismissing judicial review application

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because there was no evidence to support any of the appellant's grounds, no denial of procedural fairness, no jurisdictional error by the Authority or the primary judge, no error regarding legal representation or publication of reasons, and no demonstrated bias.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed, application for adjournment dismissed, costs awarded to first respondent.

Orders

  • The appellant's application for an adjournment is dismissed.
  • The appeal is dismissed.