Carney v Neilson [2000] NSWSC 777
The document dated 5 August 1998 stated on its face that it was the last will and testament of Edward Peter Neilsen, was signed and dated by him, disposed of all his property to the plaintiff, closely followed the form of his brother's will, and was likely made after solicitors advised him to consider making a will. Together with evidence of the plaintiff's relationship with the deceased, these matters supported the finding that the document embodied his testamentary intentions and was intended to operate as his will from the date it was signed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Application Under S18 a of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 / Judgment on Application for Declaration That Document Constitutes a Will and for Letters of Administration With the Document Annexed
- Outcome
- Declaration made; letters of administration with the document annexed ordered to be granted to the plaintiff; costs ordered out of the estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['informal Will' 'testamentary Intentions' 'letters of Administration With Will Annexed' 'costs Out of Estate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Application Under S18 a of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 / Judgment on Application for Declaration That Document Constitutes a Will and for Letters of Administration With the Document Annexed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the document dated 5 August 1998 embodied the testamentary intentions of Edward Peter Neilsen and was intended by him to operate as his will.' 'Whether letters of administration with the document annexed should be granted to Frances Clare Carney.' 'What costs order should be made.']
Ratio Decidendi
The document dated 5 August 1998 stated on its face that it was the last will and testament of Edward Peter Neilsen, was signed and dated by him, disposed of all his property to the plaintiff, closely followed the form of his brother's will, and was likely made after solicitors advised him to consider making a will. Together with evidence of the plaintiff's relationship with the deceased, these matters supported the finding that the document embodied his testamentary intentions and was intended to operate as his will from the date it was signed.
Court Disposition
Declaration made; letters of administration with the document annexed ordered to be granted to the plaintiff; costs ordered out of the estate.
Orders
- ['Declared that the document dated 5 August 1998, being Exhibit A, constitutes a will of Edward Peter Neilsen, the deceased.' 'Ordered that, subject to the requirement of the Registrar, letters of administration with such document annexed be granted to Frances Clare Carney, the sole beneficiary named in the said...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment