Franck Bauchet and Margaret Bauchet v Mirage Pools Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 201
Mirage Pools Pty Ltd was contractually and statutorily obliged to carry out the works in a good, substantial and workmanlike manner, which included sealing the pavers and providing proper drainage for the retaining wall. The Court held that these obligations arise from the main contract and statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989 and are not excluded by the presence of a warranty clause or procedural requirements for variations. Failure to seal the pavers and properly drain the retaining wall constituted breaches entitling the plaintiffs to damages, which are to be assessed by the Local Court. Damages for repairs to the pool pump and leak are also allowable despite absence...
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Franck Bauchet; Plaintiff: Margaret Bauchet; Defendant: Mirage Pools Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Appeal From Local Court to Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; matter remitted for damages assessment
- Legal Topics
- Implied Warranties, Workmanlike Manner, Damages for Breach of Contract, Parole Evidence Rule
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Franck Bauchet
Plaintiff
Margaret Bauchet
Plaintiff
Mirage Pools Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Appeal From Local Court to Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mirage Pools Pty Ltd breached the contractual and statutory obligation to carry out work in a good, substantial and workmanlike manner by failing to seal pavers and provide drainage
- 2 Whether the presence of warranty procedures limitations precluded the plaintiffs from claiming damages for breach of contract under statutory warranties
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to damages for repairs to the leaking pool and pool pump
Ratio Decidendi
Mirage Pools Pty Ltd was contractually and statutorily obliged to carry out the works in a good, substantial and workmanlike manner, which included sealing the pavers and providing proper drainage for the retaining wall. The Court held that these obligations arise from the main contract and statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989 and are not excluded by the presence of a warranty clause or procedural requirements for variations. Failure to seal the pavers and properly drain the retaining wall constituted breaches entitling the plaintiffs to damages, which are to be assessed by the Local Court. Damages for repairs to the pool pump and leak are also allowable despite absence...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; matter remitted for damages assessment
Orders
- The final judgment of Cluston LCM in favour of Mirage is set aside.
- The cross-claim is remitted to His Worship for assessment of damages, in lieu of the one hundred dollars previously assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment