Johan v R [2019] NSWCCA 126
The sentencing judge erred in failing to give effect to his finding about delay impacting remand conditions, which justified a reduction in non-parole period. Parity considerations support imposing a sentence similar to co-offenders, and the applicant is entitled to a discount for early guilty plea.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence in Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; applicant resentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'aggravated Break, Enter and Steal' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'effect of Delay on Non Parole Period' 'assessment of Subjective Case' 'parity in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence in Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to give effect to his finding that he would take into account the effect of delay when fixing the non-parole period' 'Whether parity requires similar sentences to co-offenders despite different subjective circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in failing to give effect to his finding about delay impacting remand conditions, which justified a reduction in non-parole period. Parity considerations support imposing a sentence similar to co-offenders, and the applicant is entitled to a discount for early guilty plea.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; applicant resentenced
Orders
- ['Leave granted to appeal out of time.' 'Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Sentence imposed by Blackmore SC DCJ on 23 June 2017 upon Mr Johan set aside.' 'Mr Johan is resentenced to an aggregate period of imprisonment of 5 years and 8 months commencing on 17 September 2015 and expiring on 16 May 2021.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment