Attard & Anor v Canal & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 222
The Applicants did not act negligently in constructing the shed; loss and damage to Respondents from transfer is not significant and is adequately compensated by market value; loss and damage to Applicants from removal would be substantial. The Court exercises discretion under s 3 of the Encroachment of Buildings Act to order transfer of land with payment of agreed compensation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Class 3 Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief granted to applicants; transfer of encroached land ordered with payment of compensation.
- Legal Topics
- ['encroachment' 'compensation' 'boundary Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 3 Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the encroaching owners should be ordered to remove the shed or whether the respondents should transfer the encroached land with compensation.' 'Whether the encroachment resulted from negligence or reasonable mistake.' 'Determining appropriate compensation for the transfer of land under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicants did not act negligently in constructing the shed; loss and damage to Respondents from transfer is not significant and is adequately compensated by market value; loss and damage to Applicants from removal would be substantial. The Court exercises discretion under s 3 of the Encroachment of Buildings Act to order transfer of land with payment of agreed compensation.
Court Disposition
Relief granted to applicants; transfer of encroached land ordered with payment of compensation.
Orders
- ['The Respondents transfer to the Applicants 1,190sq m of land currently forming part of Lot 119 DP 31359 between the Colorbond fence and the boundary of Lot 118 DP 31359 from the boundary at Selkirk Avenue, Cecil Park to the rear of the allotment as shown in Attachment 1.' 'The Applicants pay the Respondents...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment