Corrigan v City of Sydney Counil and anor [2006] NSWADT 138
Leave was refused because, although the refusal of the application could probably fall within refusal of services and Mr Corrigan's Irish national origin could fall within race, there was no direct evidence or factual basis from which to infer that race was one of the reasons for the refusal; the evidence instead indicated concerns about damage, noise and a general policy applied to other groups.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Proceed With Discrimination Complaint / Principal Matter
- Outcome
- Application for leave refused
- Legal Topics
- ['race Discrimination' 'direct Discrimination' 'refusal of Services' 'application for Leave to Proceed' 'reasonable Prospect of Success']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Proceed With Discrimination Complaint / Principal Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under section 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 for the complaint to proceed.' "Whether there was a reasonable prospect of proving that refusal of permission to use Sydney Square was on the ground of Mr Corrigan's race or Irish national origin."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was refused because, although the refusal of the application could probably fall within refusal of services and Mr Corrigan's Irish national origin could fall within race, there was no direct evidence or factual basis from which to infer that race was one of the reasons for the refusal; the evidence instead indicated concerns about damage, noise and a general policy applied to other groups.
Court Disposition
Application for leave refused
Orders
- ['Application for leave refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment