R v Sinkovich [2009] NSWDC 324

R v Sinkovich [2009] NSWDC 324

The offender was found guilty of knowingly taking part in the supply of a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) and supplying a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine. The objective seriousness of the offences was assessed, and the standard non-parole period was varied based on the presence of special circumstances, particularly due to the offender's lack of prior custodial sentences and his subjective circumstances. Custodial sentences were imposed for both counts, with eligibility for parole after the respective non-parole periods.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Frank John Sinkovich
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict
Outcome
conviction and custodial sentence
Legal Topics
Drug Supply, Sentencing, Joint Criminal Enterprise

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Frank John Sinkovich

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict

  1. 1 Determination of objective seriousness for drug supply offences
  2. 2 Whether standard non-parole period applies
  3. 3 Assessment of mitigating and aggravating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The offender was found guilty of knowingly taking part in the supply of a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) and supplying a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine. The objective seriousness of the offences was assessed, and the standard non-parole period was varied based on the presence of special circumstances, particularly due to the offender's lack of prior custodial sentences and his subjective circumstances. Custodial sentences were imposed for both counts, with eligibility for parole after the respective non-parole periods.

Court Disposition

conviction and custodial sentence

Orders

  • Conviction for both offences.
  • For count 1: non-parole period of 2 years from 4 July 2008 to 3 July 2010; additional term of 2 years to 3 July 2012.