R v Sinkovich [2009] NSWDC 324
The offender was found guilty of knowingly taking part in the supply of a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) and supplying a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine. The objective seriousness of the offences was assessed, and the standard non-parole period was varied based on the presence of special circumstances, particularly due to the offender's lack of prior custodial sentences and his subjective circumstances. Custodial sentences were imposed for both counts, with eligibility for parole after the respective non-parole periods.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Frank John Sinkovich
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict
- Outcome
- conviction and custodial sentence
- Legal Topics
- Drug Supply, Sentencing, Joint Criminal Enterprise
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Frank John Sinkovich
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of objective seriousness for drug supply offences
- 2 Whether standard non-parole period applies
- 3 Assessment of mitigating and aggravating circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The offender was found guilty of knowingly taking part in the supply of a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) and supplying a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine. The objective seriousness of the offences was assessed, and the standard non-parole period was varied based on the presence of special circumstances, particularly due to the offender's lack of prior custodial sentences and his subjective circumstances. Custodial sentences were imposed for both counts, with eligibility for parole after the respective non-parole periods.
Court Disposition
conviction and custodial sentence
Orders
- Conviction for both offences.
- For count 1: non-parole period of 2 years from 4 July 2008 to 3 July 2010; additional term of 2 years to 3 July 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment