McKeown v Ballina Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 13
The lot was lawfully created prior to the appointed day and could have supported a dwelling under previous controls. The proposal is consistent with the objectives of the zone, and strict compliance with the minimum area standard is unnecessary and unreasonable in this particular case given the unique history and characteristics of the land. The SEPP 1 objection is made out, so conditional consent can be granted for the caretaker's cottage.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld - conditional consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'dwelling Entitlement' 'land Use Zoning' 'minimum Lot Size' 'sepp 1 Objections']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the site has a dwelling entitlement under BLEP 1987' "Whether the proposed caretaker's cottage is consistent with the zone objectives and planning controls" 'Adequacy of SEPP 1 objection to the minimum lot area requirement' 'Public interest and impact on rural character']
Ratio Decidendi
The lot was lawfully created prior to the appointed day and could have supported a dwelling under previous controls. The proposal is consistent with the objectives of the zone, and strict compliance with the minimum area standard is unnecessary and unreasonable in this particular case given the unique history and characteristics of the land. The SEPP 1 objection is made out, so conditional consent can be granted for the caretaker's cottage.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld - conditional consent granted
Orders
- ["Conditional consent to the development application for the caretaker's cottage on Lot 2, DP 607237 to be granted, subject to compliance with access and other reasonable conditions."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment