FRANKLINS LTD and ANOR v FLANNERY [1997] NSWCA 115

FRANKLINS LTD and ANOR v FLANNERY [1997] NSWCA 115

The Judge's decision to award costs, although based on some erroneous reasons, resulted in the correct outcome because bringing the proceeding in the District Court was more efficient and did not impose significantly higher costs. Accordingly, the summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Parties
Appellant: Franklins Ltd and Anor; Respondent: Flannery
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 October 1997
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
summons dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Costs in District Court Where Proceedings Within Local Court Jurisdiction, Entitlement to Costs for Awards Under $10, 000, Sufficient Reason for Bringing Proceedings in District Court, Assessment of Damages for Minors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Franklins Ltd and Anor

Appellant

Flannery

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to costs in the District Court as judgment was less than $10,000 per DCR Pt38 r1B
  2. 2 Whether sufficient reason existed for bringing the action in the District Court rather than the Local Court

Ratio Decidendi

The Judge's decision to award costs, although based on some erroneous reasons, resulted in the correct outcome because bringing the proceeding in the District Court was more efficient and did not impose significantly higher costs. Accordingly, the summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

summons dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Summons dismissed with costs.