FRANKLINS LTD and ANOR v FLANNERY [1997] NSWCA 115
The Judge's decision to award costs, although based on some erroneous reasons, resulted in the correct outcome because bringing the proceeding in the District Court was more efficient and did not impose significantly higher costs. Accordingly, the summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Appellant: Franklins Ltd and Anor; Respondent: Flannery
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- summons dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs in District Court Where Proceedings Within Local Court Jurisdiction, Entitlement to Costs for Awards Under $10, 000, Sufficient Reason for Bringing Proceedings in District Court, Assessment of Damages for Minors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Franklins Ltd and Anor
Appellant
Flannery
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to costs in the District Court as judgment was less than $10,000 per DCR Pt38 r1B
- 2 Whether sufficient reason existed for bringing the action in the District Court rather than the Local Court
Ratio Decidendi
The Judge's decision to award costs, although based on some erroneous reasons, resulted in the correct outcome because bringing the proceeding in the District Court was more efficient and did not impose significantly higher costs. Accordingly, the summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
summons dismissed with costs
Orders
- Summons dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment