Franklins Pty Ltd v Endeavour Holdings Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1204
No order for subpoena compliance costs could or should be made because the applicants did not make a genuine attempt to agree on the amount of costs within the meaning of UCPR r 42.33 before filing the motion; sending invoices and filing the motion the next day without waiting for the defendant's response was insufficient.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Recipients of Subpoenas to Recover Costs of Production of Documents From the Issuing Party / Notice of Motion Filed on 14 March 2013
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs of Complying With a Subpoena' 'attempt to Agree Costs Before Approaching the Court' 'reasonableness of Subpoena Compliance Expenses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Recipients of Subpoenas to Recover Costs of Production of Documents From the Issuing Party / Notice of Motion Filed on 14 March 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants had attempted, but failed, to agree on the amount of costs to be paid as required by UCPR r 42.33.' 'Whether the costs claimed by the applicants for compliance with the subpoenas were reasonable under UCPR r 33.11.']
Ratio Decidendi
No order for subpoena compliance costs could or should be made because the applicants did not make a genuine attempt to agree on the amount of costs within the meaning of UCPR r 42.33 before filing the motion; sending invoices and filing the motion the next day without waiting for the defendant's response was insufficient.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The notice of motion should be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment