James v Cowan [1929] HCA 46

James v Cowan [1929] HCA 46

A refusal to obey an order made by a competent court to produce documents pursuant to subpoena, without lawful justification and based solely on external instructions, is a defiance of court authority amounting to contempt.

Parties
Plaintiff: Frederick Alexander James; Defendant: John Cowan; Appellant: Leonard Herbert Botten
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 August 1929
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Committal for Contempt
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Subpoena Duces Tecum, Privilege, Public Policy, State Documents
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Contempt of Court Subpoena Duces Tecum Privilege Public Policy State Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frederick Alexander James

Plaintiff

John Cowan

Defendant

Leonard Herbert Botten

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Committal for Contempt

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether refusal to obey a subpoena duces tecum by an officer, on ministerial direction, constitutes a contempt of court
  2. 2 Whether production of government department minute books can be withheld on grounds of privilege/public policy

Ratio Decidendi

A refusal to obey an order made by a competent court to produce documents pursuant to subpoena, without lawful justification and based solely on external instructions, is a defiance of court authority amounting to contempt.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed with costs