Harris v Mills [2009] NSWSC 339

Harris v Mills [2009] NSWSC 339

The Plaintiff was left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance by the terms of the will, given his age, long marriage, and financial circumstances; thus, provision should be made for him to receive the entire estate apart from certain specific legacies.

Parties
Plaintiff: Frederick Alfred Harris; Defendant: William Mills
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Succession Family Provision / Judgment
Outcome
Provision claim allowed.
Legal Topics
Family Provision, Eligibility of Widower, Provision for Proper Maintenance, Testamentary Discretion, Competing Claims of Beneficiaries
Succession Law Family Provision Eligibility of Widower Provision for Proper Maintenance Testamentary Discretion Competing Claims of Beneficiaries

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frederick Alfred Harris

Plaintiff

William Mills

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Succession Family Provision / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff, as widower, has been left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance by the will of the deceased under the Family Provision Act 1982.
  2. 2 Whether, in the circumstances, greater provision should be made in favour of the Plaintiff from the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff was left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance by the terms of the will, given his age, long marriage, and financial circumstances; thus, provision should be made for him to receive the entire estate apart from certain specific legacies.

Court Disposition

Provision claim allowed.

Orders

  • In lieu of the benefits given to him by the will, the Plaintiff receives the entirety of the estate of the Deceased absolutely, apart from the gifts and legacies in clause 3 (a), (b), (d), and (e) of the will.
  • Plaintiff’s costs on the party and party basis and Defendant’s costs on the indemnity basis are to be paid out of the estate of the Deceased.