Frederick Fliedner v Philips Electronics Australia Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 23
The contract was unfair to the extent that the calculation of redundancy benefits excluded the car allowance and bonus, which were part of the applicant's remuneration. No evidence established that the redundancy benefit cap itself was unfair, but not including all components of the remuneration package in the calculation was unfair under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Unfair Contract Application Under S 106 Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Contract varied; additional redundancy payment ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Contract' 'redundancy Entitlements' 'calculation of Retrenchment Benefits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Unfair Contract Application Under S 106 Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the cap on redundancy benefits rendered the contract unfair under s 106 Industrial Relations Act 1996' 'Whether exclusion of car allowance and bonus in redundancy calculation was unfair']
Ratio Decidendi
The contract was unfair to the extent that the calculation of redundancy benefits excluded the car allowance and bonus, which were part of the applicant's remuneration. No evidence established that the redundancy benefit cap itself was unfair, but not including all components of the remuneration package in the calculation was unfair under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Contract varied; additional redundancy payment ordered
Orders
- ['The contract of employment is varied to provide redundancy payments include annual bonus and car allowance.' 'The respondent is to pay the applicant $24,793 plus interest from 31 January 2001 to the date of judgment.' 'Costs reserved; liberty to apply with respect to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment