Kratz v East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 94

Kratz v East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 94

The Tribunal found the trade contractor in substantial breach of contract for defective work on concrete columns following valid default notices and directions under the contract. Because only some rectification costs met the proper contractual procedure (incurred after default notices were received), the applicant could recover those, together with certain completion costs, but not broader damages for misleading conduct or pre-notice rectification. Only Frederick Kratz’s claim against East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd succeeded in part; other applicant claims were dismissed for want of standing or lack of contractual privity.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Building Claim / Final Decision
Outcome
Applicant Frederick Kratz succeeds in part; other claims dismissed. Monetary orders for rectification and completion costs. Procedure for subsequent costs applications set.
Legal Topics
['defective Work' 'rectification Costs' 'termination of Contract' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'home Building Act Warranties' 'service of Directions']
['building and Construction' 'contract'] ['defective Work' 'rectification Costs' 'termination of Contract' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'home Building Act Warranties' 'service of Directions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Building Claim / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether claims for defects, incomplete work, and misleading conduct are established under contract and statute' 'Whether contractual procedures for termination and rectification were complied with' 'Whether notices of default were validly served' 'Whether damages are payable for defective and incomplete works, and if so, quantum']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found the trade contractor in substantial breach of contract for defective work on concrete columns following valid default notices and directions under the contract. Because only some rectification costs met the proper contractual procedure (incurred after default notices were received), the applicant could recover those, together with certain completion costs, but not broader damages for misleading conduct or pre-notice rectification. Only Frederick Kratz’s claim against East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd succeeded in part; other applicant claims were dismissed for want of standing or lack of contractual privity.

Court Disposition

Applicant Frederick Kratz succeeds in part; other claims dismissed. Monetary orders for rectification and completion costs. Procedure for subsequent costs applications set.

Orders

  • ["Christine Kratz's claim against East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd and Mark Papadopoulos and Megan Louise Papadopoulos is dismissed." "Michael Kratz's claim against East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd and Mark Papadopoulos and Megan Louise Papadopoulos is dismissed." 'East Coast Formwork & Concrete Pty Ltd...