R v Botrus (No 5) [2020] NSWSC 1642
The reasons in R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 were varied because an administrative error caused the omission of an intended fourth reason for refusing the further alternative direction sought by the accused, namely that the direction would be unnecessary and confusing in the context of the case.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Criminal / Adjustment to Judgment Following Ruling During Trial
- Outcome
- The Court refused, on 16 September 2020, to make the primary, alternative or further alternative direction sought by the accused; the reasons for judgment in R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 were varied to add the omitted reason.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjustment to Judgment' 'directions Sought by Accused']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Criminal / Adjustment to Judgment Following Ruling During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the published reasons in R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 should be varied to include an omitted fourth reason concerning the further alternative direction sought by the accused.']
Ratio Decidendi
The reasons in R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 were varied because an administrative error caused the omission of an intended fourth reason for refusing the further alternative direction sought by the accused, namely that the direction would be unnecessary and confusing in the context of the case.
Court Disposition
The Court refused, on 16 September 2020, to make the primary, alternative or further alternative direction sought by the accused; the reasons for judgment in R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 were varied to add the omitted reason.
Orders
- ['The reasons for judgment in R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 are varied by adding the omitted fourth reason at [51].' 'The final paragraph of the judgment shall still be introduced by the word "Lastly".']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment