Freedom Development Group Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1504
Because the parties reached agreement at a s 34 conciliation conference and the Court was satisfied that the development as modified was substantially the same as the development originally approved, the Court could exercise its s 4.55(8) function and modify the consent to reduce the s 7.11 monetary contribution to $682,215 in accordance with the amended contribution plan calculation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application Pursuant to S 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and Development Consent 18/0531 is modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent Modification' 'section 7.11 Development Contributions' 'conciliation Conference' 'boarding House Development']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application Pursuant to S 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could modify Development Consent No. 18/0531 under s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the development as modified is substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted.' 'Whether Part 2 condition 4 should be amended to reduce the monetary contribution required under s 7.11 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Sutherland Shire Council Section 7.11 Development Contribution Plan 2016.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement at a s 34 conciliation conference and the Court was satisfied that the development as modified was substantially the same as the development originally approved, the Court could exercise its s 4.55(8) function and modify the consent to reduce the s 7.11 monetary contribution to $682,215 in accordance with the amended contribution plan calculation.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and Development Consent 18/0531 is modified.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent 18/0531 granted on 3 April 2019 for two boarding houses containing a total of 65 rooms and basement parking, is modified to amend the monetary contribution requirement in Part 2 condition 4 of the conditions of consent to $682,215, subject to the consolidated conditions...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment