Freshfood Holdings Pte Limited v Pablo Enterprise Pte Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 1404
FreshFood did not use the PABLO Mark during the relevant period but the Court exercised its discretion under s 101(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) not to remove the mark from the Register, due to the absence of abandonment, genuine subsequent sales, and residual reputation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Freshfood Holdings Pte Limited; First Respondent: Pablo Enterprise Pte Limited; Second Respondent: Registrar of Trade Marks
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Non Use Application, Registrar's Discretion, Removal of Trade Marks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Freshfood Holdings Pte Limited
Appellant
Pablo Enterprise Pte Limited
First Respondent
Registrar of Trade Marks
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-use of trade mark within the relevant period under s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) was established
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under s 101(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
FreshFood did not use the PABLO Mark during the relevant period but the Court exercised its discretion under s 101(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) not to remove the mark from the Register, due to the absence of abandonment, genuine subsequent sales, and residual reputation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal be allowed.
- The decision of the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks dated 17 December 2020 be set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment