Zadel v Eastern Suburbs Leagues Club Ltd [2018] NSWDC 140
On the balance of probabilities, the plaintiff's heel contacted and slipped on the base of the barricade post, causing her fall; that finding established negligence given the defendants' admission of breach. The plaintiff was contributorily negligent because she moved backwards towards a known barricade and stage step without looking or otherwise being aware of their position, but her responsibility was minor and warranted a 10% reduction. The fall caused a soft tissue injury to the lower back and pelvis or sacroiliac area that largely resolved by the time she returned to work in August 2014, and ongoing hip, shoulder, heel and later work-related back complaints were not attributable to...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Negligence Claim for Personal Injury Damages Arising From a Fall on a Dance Floor / Principal Judgment After Trial; Liability and Damages Determined; Question of Costs Reserved; Leave Granted to File Notice of Discontinuance in Respect of the Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $10,336.02, with costs reserved and leave to file the Notice of Discontinuance in respect of the cross-claim.
- Legal Topics
- ['fall on Dancefloor' 'causation' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages' 'pre Existing Condition' 'lost Earning Capacity' 'domestic Assistance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence Claim for Personal Injury Damages Arising From a Fall on a Dance Floor / Principal Judgment After Trial; Liability and Damages Determined; Question of Costs Reserved; Leave Granted to File Notice of Discontinuance in Respect of the Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the base of the temporary barricade post caused the plaintiff's fall." 'Whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent by moving backwards while dancing despite knowing of the barricade.' "Whether the plaintiff's injuries were a short-duration soft tissue injury or an ongoing aggravation of pre-existing degenerative lumbar changes." 'What damages were recoverable for past lost earnings, out-of-pocket expenses, non-economic loss, domestic assistance and lost earning capacity.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the plaintiff's heel contacted and slipped on the base of the barricade post, causing her fall; that finding established negligence given the defendants' admission of breach. The plaintiff was contributorily negligent because she moved backwards towards a known barricade and stage step without looking or otherwise being aware of their position, but her responsibility was minor and warranted a 10% reduction. The fall caused a soft tissue injury to the lower back and pelvis or sacroiliac area that largely resolved by the time she returned to work in August 2014, and ongoing hip, shoulder, heel and later work-related back complaints were not attributable to...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $10,336.02, with costs reserved and leave to file the Notice of Discontinuance in respect of the cross-claim.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $10,336.02.' 'The question of costs reserved to a date to be fixed upon the representatives of the parties contacting my associate within seven days.' 'Leave to file in court the Notice of Discontinuance in respect of the cross-claim.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment