Ashfield Council V Fuda [1999] NSWLEC 79
Convictions and penalties based on the defendant's commission of building works—including re-skinning, basement construction, and floor replacement—within a heritage conservation area without the requisite approvals or consents, in breach of statutory requirements and council policy.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Penalty Determination After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- convicted and fined
- Legal Topics
- ['building Works' 'heritage Conservation' 'development Consent' 'unauthorised Alteration']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Penalty Determination After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant undertook building works within a heritage conservation area without the required consent or approval from Ashfield Council' 'Appropriate penalties for offences relating to unauthorised re-skinning, basement construction, and floor replacement']
Ratio Decidendi
Convictions and penalties based on the defendant's commission of building works—including re-skinning, basement construction, and floor replacement—within a heritage conservation area without the requisite approvals or consents, in breach of statutory requirements and council policy.
Court Disposition
convicted and fined
Orders
- ['Defendant convicted for proceeding 50022/98 and fined $15,000 to be paid to council within three months.' "Defendant to pay prosecutor's costs as determined under s 52(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 for 50022/98." 'Defendant convicted for proceeding 50033/98 and fined $2,000 to be paid to council...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment