Funds First Pty Ltd & 2 ors v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 66609 & 10 ors (No. 2) [2008] NSWSC 428
Security for costs should not be ordered against a corporate plaintiff where there are co-plaintiffs against whom security would not be ordered, and the joinder of the corporate plaintiff does not significantly expand the case or create a practical risk of unrecoverable costs for the defendants.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Funds First Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Cannes Management Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Kerry Baranov; Defendant: Owners Corporation Strata Plan 66609; Defendant: Greg Cook; Defendant: Phoung TH Nguyen; Defendant: Andrew Smith; Defendant: Ms B Stevens; Defendant: Joseph Jean Espriritu; Defendant: Leanne Marie Scanes; Defendant: Clive Mancey; Defendant: Dianne Mancey; Defendant: Ronald Wood; Defendant: R Yip
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory (motion Determined Before Full Hearing)
- Outcome
- Motion for security for costs dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Corporate Impecuniosity, Trustee Corporations, Co Plaintiffs and Security, Party Joinder Effects on Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Funds First Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Cannes Management Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Kerry Baranov
Plaintiff
Owners Corporation Strata Plan 66609
Defendant
Greg Cook
Defendant
Phoung TH Nguyen
Defendant
Andrew Smith
Defendant
Ms B Stevens
Defendant
Joseph Jean Espriritu
Defendant
Leanne Marie Scanes
Defendant
Clive Mancey
Defendant
Dianne Mancey
Defendant
Ronald Wood
Defendant
R Yip
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory (motion Determined Before Full Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against a corporate trustee plaintiff where other co-plaintiffs exist against whom security would not be ordered.
- 2 Whether the inclusion of a corporate plaintiff significantly expands the case or increases practical risk to the defendants regarding costs.
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs should not be ordered against a corporate plaintiff where there are co-plaintiffs against whom security would not be ordered, and the joinder of the corporate plaintiff does not significantly expand the case or create a practical risk of unrecoverable costs for the defendants.
Court Disposition
Motion for security for costs dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs.
- The provisional fixture of the matter on 25 March 2008 for one day before the Chief Judge is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment