Furia Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1409

Furia Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1409

Allowing the increase in child care numbers is justified as on-street parking impacts are de minimus, the DCP permits flexibility in parking rates with abundant on-street parking available, and there are sufficient management controls to limit adverse amenity impacts, thus satisfying relevant statutory and planning provisions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld, application to modify development consent granted.
Legal Topics
['development Consent Modification' 'child Care Centres' 'on Street Parking' 'residential Amenity' 'planning Instruments']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether modification to increase the number of children at a child care centre and reliance on on-street parking is acceptable given potential impacts on residential amenity.']

Ratio Decidendi

Allowing the increase in child care numbers is justified as on-street parking impacts are de minimus, the DCP permits flexibility in parking rates with abundant on-street parking available, and there are sufficient management controls to limit adverse amenity impacts, thus satisfying relevant statutory and planning provisions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld, application to modify development consent granted.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The application MA17/0558 to modify development consent DA12/0673 for a child care facility at 168 National Avenue, Loftus, by increasing the number of children from 36 to 48, is granted.' 'Development consent DA12/0673 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions set out in...