In the matter of Futre Developments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1712
The statutory demand was served on the plaintiff when it was delivered by Australia Post to the letterbox maintained at the street address of the registered office at 11:22 AM on 17 September 2014. As a result, the plaintiff's application to set aside the statutory demand, filed and served on 9 October 2014, was out of time under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Futre Developments Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Joseph Hoi; Second Defendant: Hoi Constructions Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Final Judgment After Separate Determination of a Preliminary Question
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Winding Up, Service by Post, Time Limits, Registered Office, Proof of Delivery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Futre Developments Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Joseph Hoi
First Defendant
Hoi Constructions Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Final Judgment After Separate Determination of a Preliminary Question
Legal Issues
- 1 When was the statutory demand served on the plaintiff for the purposes of s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)?
- 2 Does the evidence establish delivery to the plaintiff's registered office on a particular date, and what is the legal consequence for the timing of the application to set aside the demand?
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory demand was served on the plaintiff when it was delivered by Australia Post to the letterbox maintained at the street address of the registered office at 11:22 AM on 17 September 2014. As a result, the plaintiff's application to set aside the statutory demand, filed and served on 9 October 2014, was out of time under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Order that the originating process be dismissed.
- Order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment