G v Family and Community Services [2019] NSWSC 229
There was no evidentiary basis or exceptional circumstances established by G's application to justify intervention by the Supreme Court in the interim care orders made by the Children's Court; the applicant's opinions and the expert's report were insufficient to found the exercise of the parens patriae jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: G; First Defendant: Family and Community Services; Second Defendant: Bandyopadhyay Bhaskar
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Summons / Application to Set Aside Interim Care Orders and for Urgent Child Recovery Order
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Children, Parens Patriae, Interim Care Orders, Urgent Child Recovery, Variation of Children's Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Plaintiff
Family and Community Services
First Defendant
Bandyopadhyay Bhaskar
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summons / Application to Set Aside Interim Care Orders and for Urgent Child Recovery Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders setting aside interim care orders should be made
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its parens patriae jurisdiction to intervene in Children's Court proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidentiary basis or exceptional circumstances established by G's application to justify intervention by the Supreme Court in the interim care orders made by the Children's Court; the applicant's opinions and the expert's report were insufficient to found the exercise of the parens patriae jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment