G v R [2021] NSWCCA 50
Although the judge erred in characterising the objective seriousness of the applicant's offending in count 2 as higher than co-offender A, the overall sentence is supported on resentencing because of the applicant's substantial involvement, prior convictions, and lack of a justifiable sense of grievance on parity, thereby justifying the original sentence imposed.
- Parties
- Applicant: G; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Procedural Fairness, Parity in Sentencing, Objective Seriousness, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to afford procedural fairness in assessing the objective seriousness of the knowingly take part in supply offence
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to consider or refer to the offender's oral evidence
- 3 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the approach to parity in relation to the aggregate sentence imposed, particularly regarding co-offender 'A'
Ratio Decidendi
Although the judge erred in characterising the objective seriousness of the applicant's offending in count 2 as higher than co-offender A, the overall sentence is supported on resentencing because of the applicant's substantial involvement, prior convictions, and lack of a justifiable sense of grievance on parity, thereby justifying the original sentence imposed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment