Burnett v Browne [2019] FCA 1233
The appeal was dismissed because the notice of appeal was deficient and failed to identify any ground with reasonable prospects of success; the procedural and substantive complaints were either misconceived or not substantiated on the evidence and the application to dismiss the appeal was appropriate.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gail Burnett; Respondent: Roland Browne; Respondent: Anthony Fitzgerald
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application to Dismiss Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deficient Notice of Appeal, No Reasonable Prospects of Success, Costs Order, Solvency, Dismissal of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gail Burnett
Appellant
Roland Browne
Respondent
Anthony Fitzgerald
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application to Dismiss Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice of appeal was sufficiently particularised to comply with the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
- 2 Whether any grounds of appeal raised reasonable prospects of success
- 3 Whether the Bankruptcy Notice was defective
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the notice of appeal was deficient and failed to identify any ground with reasonable prospects of success; the procedural and substantive complaints were either misconceived or not substantiated on the evidence and the application to dismiss the appeal was appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The respondents' costs on appeal be taxed and paid out of the estate of the appellant in accordance with s 109(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment