Watts, in the matter of Watts [2011] FCA 1185
The application was refused because the plaintiff failed to provide adequate evidence as to the business, activities, or affairs of the companies concerned, or his past or intended role in their management, and failed to establish a proper foundation for the exercise of the discretion to grant leave under s 206G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), either generally or for particular classes of companies.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gambhir Watts
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Manage Corporations / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Manage Corporations, Disqualification of Directors, Bankruptcy and Corporate Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gambhir Watts
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Manage Corporations / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave under s 206G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to manage corporations, despite being disqualified due to bankruptcy
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the plaintiff failed to provide adequate evidence as to the business, activities, or affairs of the companies concerned, or his past or intended role in their management, and failed to establish a proper foundation for the exercise of the discretion to grant leave under s 206G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), either generally or for particular classes of companies.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The originating process be dismissed.
- A copy of these reasons be forwarded by a Deputy District Registrar to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment