GAR – Application for an inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2019] NSWSC 982
There is no new or significant material to justify reconsidering GAR's conviction; all relevant issues, including the veracity of E's and ER's evidence, have been exhaustively examined in multiple proceedings. There are no special facts or circumstances warranting the exercise of the court's discretion under s 78.
- Parties
- Applicant: GAR; Respondent: Attorney General for NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Inquiry Into Conviction / Determination of Application Under S 78 of the Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Inquiry Into Conviction, Sexual Assault, Reconsideration of Previously Examined Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GAR
Applicant
Attorney General for NSW
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Inquiry Into Conviction / Determination of Application Under S 78 of the Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an inquiry should be conducted into GAR's conviction for sexual assault under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
- 2 Whether issues previously examined should be reconsidered based on new material
Ratio Decidendi
There is no new or significant material to justify reconsidering GAR's conviction; all relevant issues, including the veracity of E's and ER's evidence, have been exhaustively examined in multiple proceedings. There are no special facts or circumstances warranting the exercise of the court's discretion under s 78.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- The Court refuses to consider or otherwise deal further with the application in accordance with s 79(3)(a) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment