GAR v R (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164
None of the alleged errors, whether in refusal to discharge the jury, directions as to the reliability of evidence, fresh evidence, or reasonableness of the jury's verdicts, amounted to a miscarriage of justice. There was significant corroborative evidence beyond the disputed witness, and the judge's handling of the proceedings was within discretion. Appeal dismissed despite leave being granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['armed Robbery' 'detain for Advantage' 'steal Motor Vehicle' 'fresh Evidence' 'jury Discharge' 'evidence Reliability' 'directions Concerning Delay' 'unreasonable Verdicts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether refusal to discharge the jury amounted to a miscarriage of justice' 'Whether directions concerning evidence and delay were adequate, including s.165 Evidence Act 1995 and Longman warnings' 'Whether fresh evidence warranted setting aside convictions' 'Whether the verdicts were unreasonable or unsupported by evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the alleged errors, whether in refusal to discharge the jury, directions as to the reliability of evidence, fresh evidence, or reasonableness of the jury's verdicts, amounted to a miscarriage of justice. There was significant corroborative evidence beyond the disputed witness, and the judge's handling of the proceedings was within discretion. Appeal dismissed despite leave being granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal granted.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal against conviction dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment