Garnet International Resources Pty Ltd v Barton International Inc [2005] FCA 93
The masked portions of documents claimed as irrelevant or commercially sensitive may be excluded from production for inspection by the applicant, subject to the applicant's liberty to apply to the Court to test the assertions of irrelevance and commercial sensitivity by inspection in accordance with agreed directions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Garnet International Resources Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Barton International Inc; Second Respondent: GMA Garnet Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Directions Hearing / Interlocutory Orders Regarding Discovery
- Outcome
- The applicant's motion for dismissal was adjourned generally, and costs awarded to the applicant. The applicant was granted inspection of specified documents, with masked portions excluded subject to liberty to apply. The first respondent's motion for leave to amend its defence and cross-claim was adjourned. The...
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Document Production, Commercial Sensitivity, Discretionary Power, Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Garnet International Resources Pty Ltd
Applicant
Barton International Inc
First Respondent
GMA Garnet Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Directions Hearing / Interlocutory Orders Regarding Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether masked portions of discovered documents should be produced for inspection
- 2 Whether claims of irrelevance and commercial sensitivity justify non-production of redacted portions
- 3 Whether order for discovery should be varied
Ratio Decidendi
The masked portions of documents claimed as irrelevant or commercially sensitive may be excluded from production for inspection by the applicant, subject to the applicant's liberty to apply to the Court to test the assertions of irrelevance and commercial sensitivity by inspection in accordance with agreed directions.
Court Disposition
The applicant's motion for dismissal was adjourned generally, and costs awarded to the applicant. The applicant was granted inspection of specified documents, with masked portions excluded subject to liberty to apply. The first respondent's motion for leave to amend its defence and cross-claim was adjourned. The...
Orders
- Applicant's motion for dismissal adjourned generally
- First respondent to pay applicant's costs of the motion for dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment