ADAMS v. PUBLIC TRUSTEE [2004] NSWSC 1161
The plaintiff was an eligible son of the deceased, received no effective provision under the will, had established financial needs, and had not engaged in conduct disentitling him to provision. Balancing his needs against the small estate and the competing circumstances of the beneficiary, adequate provision required an order for $40,000 from the estate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings Under S.7 of the Family Provision Act 1982 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; provision ordered for the plaintiff from the deceased's estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision Claim by Son' 'no Provision in Will' 'eligible Person' 'adequate Provision' 'small Estate' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceedings Under S.7 of the Family Provision Act 1982 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff, as a son of the deceased, was an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982.' "Whether no provision or inadequate provision was made for the plaintiff by the deceased's will." "Whether the plaintiff's relationship and contact with the deceased disentitled him to provision from the estate." "What provision, if any, should be made for the plaintiff having regard to the estate, his needs and the beneficiary's competing position."]
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was an eligible son of the deceased, received no effective provision under the will, had established financial needs, and had not engaged in conduct disentitling him to provision. Balancing his needs against the small estate and the competing circumstances of the beneficiary, adequate provision required an order for $40,000 from the estate.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; provision ordered for the plaintiff from the deceased's estate.
Orders
- ['An order is made pursuant to the Act for provision to be made out of the estate of the deceased for the plaintiff in the sum of $40,000.' "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs." "The defendant's costs are to be paid out of the estate on the indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment