Baines v R [2016] NSWCCA 132
The sentencing judge’s assessment of objective seriousness for each offence, particularly treating minor breast touchings at the middle range, was erroneous; the aggregate sentence was manifestly excessive compared with similar cases. The mitigating factors, including low objective seriousness, applicant's good character, and lack of prior convictions, warranted a significantly lesser sentence for each count and overall.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'indecent Assault' 'manifest Excess' 'objective Seriousness' 'aggregate Sentence' 'abuse of Trust' 'professional Misconduct' 'summary Disposition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of each offence' 'Whether comparative cases support the sentence imposed' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by not accounting for summary disposition' 'Distinction between sentencing for uncharged acts and taking account of surrounding circumstances' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge’s assessment of objective seriousness for each offence, particularly treating minor breast touchings at the middle range, was erroneous; the aggregate sentence was manifestly excessive compared with similar cases. The mitigating factors, including low objective seriousness, applicant's good character, and lack of prior convictions, warranted a significantly lesser sentence for each count and overall.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment