Burns v McKee [2015] NSWCATAD 158
Although there was no evidence of the content of the conversation, a fair minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that a private conversation between the presiding member and a party who is now the applicant, in the absence of the other party, could mean the member might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the matter; the member therefore recused herself.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Disqualification or Recusal for Apprehended And/or Actual Bias / Ex Tempore Procedural Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for disqualification of member for apprehended bias upheld.
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'actual Bias' 'recusal' 'private Conversation With a Party' 'case Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Disqualification or Recusal for Apprehended And/or Actual Bias / Ex Tempore Procedural Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the presiding member should recuse herself on the ground of apprehended and/or actual bias after the respondent observed the member in private conversation with the applicant in an earlier matter.' 'Whether it was necessary to address the alternative ground for recusal based on Burns v Gaynor [2015] NSWCATAD 24.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although there was no evidence of the content of the conversation, a fair minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that a private conversation between the presiding member and a party who is now the applicant, in the absence of the other party, could mean the member might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the matter; the member therefore recused herself.
Court Disposition
Application for disqualification of member for apprehended bias upheld.
Orders
- ['The presiding member recused herself.' 'The matter will be rescheduled for another day.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment