Burns v Sunol (No 2) [2014] NSWCATAD 44
Mr Sunol breached specific Tribunal orders by publishing material on his website and blog to the same or similar effect as material previously found to be unlawful homosexual vilification and victimisation of Mr Burns. Order 6 (homosexual vilification) was breached by publishing statements that the Mardi Gras is run by 'perverts and criminals', which the Tribunal held similar to prior unlawful publications. Order 11 (victimisation) was breached by continuing to publish derogatory statements describing Mr Burns as a 'liar', 'thief', and 'committed perjury' because Mr Burns had brought complaints under the Act. As a result, Mr Sunol is liable to pay Mr Burns damages of $2,500 for each...
- Parties
- Applicant: Garry Burns; Respondent: John Sunol
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Anti Discrimination / Remedy for Breach of Tribunal Orders
- Outcome
- Orders for damages against respondent for breach of Tribunal orders.
- Legal Topics
- Homosexual Vilification, Victimisation, Remedies for Breach of Tribunal Orders, Section 108 Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Garry Burns
Applicant
John Sunol
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Anti Discrimination / Remedy for Breach of Tribunal Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Sunol breached Tribunal orders to refrain from publishing homosexually vilifying or victimising material
- 2 Whether Mr Sunol is liable for damages under s 108(7) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 for non-compliance
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Sunol breached specific Tribunal orders by publishing material on his website and blog to the same or similar effect as material previously found to be unlawful homosexual vilification and victimisation of Mr Burns. Order 6 (homosexual vilification) was breached by publishing statements that the Mardi Gras is run by 'perverts and criminals', which the Tribunal held similar to prior unlawful publications. Order 11 (victimisation) was breached by continuing to publish derogatory statements describing Mr Burns as a 'liar', 'thief', and 'committed perjury' because Mr Burns had brought complaints under the Act. As a result, Mr Sunol is liable to pay Mr Burns damages of $2,500 for each...
Court Disposition
Orders for damages against respondent for breach of Tribunal orders.
Orders
- Mr Sunol is to pay Mr Burns the sum of $2,500 within 28 days for breaching Order 6 of the orders made in Burns v Sunol [2014] NSWCATAD 2.
- Mr Sunol is to pay Mr Burns the sum of $2,500 within 28 days for breaching Order 11 of the orders made in Burns v Sunol [2014] NSWCATAD 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment