Garry Gray Cameron [1997] NSWLST 11
On the evidence, Garry Gray Cameron misappropriated $57,575.44 of client funds and committed wilful breaches of statutory and regulatory obligations in relation to trust accounts and client monies, amounting to professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Misconduct Complaint / Final Determination
- Outcome
- name removed from Roll of Legal Practitioners in New South Wales; costs order
- Legal Topics
- ['professional Misconduct' 'trust Account Misappropriation' 'breach of Statutory Duties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Professional Misconduct Complaint / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Did Garry Gray Cameron misappropriate client funds?' 'Did Garry Gray Cameron breach sections 61 and 62 of the Legal Profession Act 1987?' 'Did Garry Gray Cameron breach Regulation 11(2)(c) of the Trust Account and Controlled Money Regulation?' 'Did Garry Gray Cameron breach section 24A of the Victims Compensation Act?']
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, Garry Gray Cameron misappropriated $57,575.44 of client funds and committed wilful breaches of statutory and regulatory obligations in relation to trust accounts and client monies, amounting to professional misconduct and unsatisfactory professional conduct.
Court Disposition
name removed from Roll of Legal Practitioners in New South Wales; costs order
Orders
- ['That the name of Garry Gray Cameron be removed from the Roll of Legal Practitioners in New South Wales.' 'That the Solicitor pay the costs of the Law Society in such sum as the parties may agree, and in the absence of agreement, as determined by the Tribunal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment