Re MF Global Australia Ltd (in liq); Hopper v Campbell in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Ltd (in liq) [2015] NSWSC 1583
It was not unreasonable for Mr Hopper to reject the 2013 Calderbank offer, as it was made at an early stage of the proceedings, before pleadings and before he had access to critical documents, and the compromise offered would have required him to surrender substantial claims; thus, indemnity costs should only commence from 2 August 2014, following the later rejected offer of compromise.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Garry Raymond Hopper; First Defendant: Christopher Robert Campbell in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Limited (in liquidation); Second Defendant: David John Frank Lombe in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Limited (in liquidation); Third Defendant: Vaughan Neil Strawbridge in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Limited (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 1321 Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed. Costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Orders for Costs on Indemnity Basis, Calderbank Offers, Reasonableness of Rejection of Compromise Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Garry Raymond Hopper
Plaintiff
Christopher Robert Campbell in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Limited (in liquidation)
First Defendant
David John Frank Lombe in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Limited (in liquidation)
Second Defendant
Vaughan Neil Strawbridge in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Limited (in liquidation)
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 1321 Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Plaintiff should pay indemnity costs from the date of a rejected Calderbank offer
- 2 Whether it was unreasonable for the Plaintiff to reject the Calderbank offer
Ratio Decidendi
It was not unreasonable for Mr Hopper to reject the 2013 Calderbank offer, as it was made at an early stage of the proceedings, before pleadings and before he had access to critical documents, and the compromise offered would have required him to surrender substantial claims; thus, indemnity costs should only commence from 2 August 2014, following the later rejected offer of compromise.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed. Costs orders made.
Orders
- The proceedings be dismissed.
- The Plaintiff pay the Defendants' costs on the ordinary basis until 1 August 2014 and thereafter on an indemnity basis, as agreed or as assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment