Regina v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83

Regina v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83

While the trial judge erred in not directing the jury that certain representations made by the appellant to Mrs Glasby were not evidence of their truth, this did not amount to a fundamental miscarriage of justice; the statutory scheme made Mrs Glasby a compellable witness; the maximum sentence was open given the appellant's greater culpability; there was no error in refusing to discharge the jury or in the parity of sentencing.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Garry Zane Glasby
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal on conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal on sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
Murder, Compellability of Spouse, Statutory Interpretation, Common Law Presumptions, Admissibility of Evidence, Jury Directions, Parity of Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Garry Zane Glasby

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in requiring the appellant's spouse to give evidence against her wishes under s 18 Evidence Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether Mrs Glasby was properly cross-examined under s 38 Evidence Act 1995
  3. 3 Whether the jury was misdirected regarding the admissibility and truth of representations made by the appellant to Mrs Glasby

Ratio Decidendi

While the trial judge erred in not directing the jury that certain representations made by the appellant to Mrs Glasby were not evidence of their truth, this did not amount to a fundamental miscarriage of justice; the statutory scheme made Mrs Glasby a compellable witness; the maximum sentence was open given the appellant's greater culpability; there was no error in refusing to discharge the jury or in the parity of sentencing.

Court Disposition

Appeal on conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal on sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal on conviction dismissed.
  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted.