BLOOMFIELD, Gary v R [2013] NSWCCA 315
The sentencing judge did not misapply the Henry guideline or double count the element of company. The offender was an adult with significant prior criminal antecedents, the victim was particularly vulnerable, the offence involved actual violence and a threat of a knife, and the sentence of 4 years and 6 months after a 25 per cent guilty plea discount was within range and not manifestly excessive.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence Imposed by the District Court; Application and Appeal Heard Simultaneously
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['robbery in Company' 'henry Guideline Judgment' 'manifest Excess' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'victim Vulnerability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence Imposed by the District Court; Application and Appeal Heard Simultaneously
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying the guideline judgment in R v Henry to an offence of robbery in company.' 'Whether the sentence imposed for robbery in company was manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not misapply the Henry guideline or double count the element of company. The offender was an adult with significant prior criminal antecedents, the victim was particularly vulnerable, the offence involved actual violence and a threat of a knife, and the sentence of 4 years and 6 months after a 25 per cent guilty plea discount was within range and not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment