Buttery v Woollahra Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 1141
The amended plans remained consistent with the overall description of the type of development in the original application and, although there were numerous changes and the building would appear quite different, the proposal was not conceptually different and bore sufficient resemblance to the original proposal to be accepted as the application for the appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Development Application / Notice of Motion Seeking Leave to Rely on Amended Plans
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion allowed; amended plans accepted for the purposes of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'amended Plans' 'two Storey Attached Dwellings' 'environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Cl 55']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Development Application / Notice of Motion Seeking Leave to Rely on Amended Plans
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be permitted to rely on amended plans for the proposed development at 10-12 South Street, Edgecliff.' 'Whether the amended plans were so different from the original proposal that they should not be accepted as amendments.']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended plans remained consistent with the overall description of the type of development in the original application and, although there were numerous changes and the building would appear quite different, the proposal was not conceptually different and bore sufficient resemblance to the original proposal to be accepted as the application for the appeal.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion allowed; amended plans accepted for the purposes of the appeal.
Orders
- ['The plans in Exhibit D can now constitute the application for the purposes of this appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment