Dates (Worimi) v Commissioner of Police; Dates (Worimi) v Director General, NSW Land and Housing Corporation as agent for the Aboriginal Housing Corporation [2005] NSWADT 221
The police complaint was dismissed because, although Worimi was aboriginal and some police actions and charges later failed, the evidence did not establish that the police conduct, investigation, charges, attendance, opinions, or responses to complaints were on the ground of his aboriginality or that a non-aboriginal person would have been treated more favourably. The Housing complaint was substantiated because Housing knew Worimi was the target of persistent racial abuse and threats, failed to act on that conduct, treated him in the same way as non-aboriginal neighbours whose conduct was materially more serious, threatened Tribunal proceedings and relocation, and the only reasonable...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Race Discrimination Goods and Services / Principal Matter
- Outcome
- The complaint against the Commissioner of Police was dismissed. The complaint against the Director General of the NSW Land and Housing Corporation as agent for the Aboriginal Housing Corporation was substantiated, and compensation of $5,000 was ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['race Discrimination' 'provision of Services' 'police Services' 'public Housing Services' 'less Favourable Treatment' 'compensation for Loss and Damage']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Race Discrimination Goods and Services / Principal Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Commissioner of Police treated Worimi less favourably than a non-aboriginal person in the same or materially similar circumstances on the ground of race in the provision of services.' 'Whether Housing failed to act on complaints of race-based conduct towards Worimi and treated him less favourably than a non-aboriginal person would have been treated in materially similar circumstances.' "Whether Housing's application to the Residential Tribunal for compliance orders against Worimi was discriminatory." "Whether Worimi suffered compensable loss and damage by reason of Housing's discriminatory conduct."]
Ratio Decidendi
The police complaint was dismissed because, although Worimi was aboriginal and some police actions and charges later failed, the evidence did not establish that the police conduct, investigation, charges, attendance, opinions, or responses to complaints were on the ground of his aboriginality or that a non-aboriginal person would have been treated more favourably. The Housing complaint was substantiated because Housing knew Worimi was the target of persistent racial abuse and threats, failed to act on that conduct, treated him in the same way as non-aboriginal neighbours whose conduct was materially more serious, threatened Tribunal proceedings and relocation, and the only reasonable...
Court Disposition
The complaint against the Commissioner of Police was dismissed. The complaint against the Director General of the NSW Land and Housing Corporation as agent for the Aboriginal Housing Corporation was substantiated, and compensation of $5,000 was ordered.
Orders
- ['Matter 041055: The complaint against the Commissioner of Police is dismissed.' 'Matter 041055: Each party is to pay their own costs.' 'Matter 041056: The complaint against the Director General of the NSW Land and Housing Corporation as agent for the Aboriginal Housing Corporation is substantiated.' "Matter 041056:...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment