Rayner v Rayner [2020] NSWSC 1536
The applicant failed to sufficiently establish an equitable claim before the Tribunal or on appeal so as to engage the Tribunal's jurisdiction to refuse or stay a possession order; the statutory obligation to make an order for possession was not displaced.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Appeal Panel of Civil and Administrative Tribunal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tenancy Termination' 'orders for Possession' 'equitable Claims as Defence' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Appeal Panel of Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in finding it lacked jurisdiction to consider an equitable claim in defence to possession' 'Whether the plaintiff sufficiently established an equitable claim to warrant procedural accommodation or relief' 'Whether the Tribunal was obliged to withhold possession order pending determination of the equity in a court of competent jurisdiction']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to sufficiently establish an equitable claim before the Tribunal or on appeal so as to engage the Tribunal's jurisdiction to refuse or stay a possession order; the statutory obligation to make an order for possession was not displaced.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted in respect of grounds 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6' 'Leave to appeal refused in respect of ground 5' 'Summons filed on 7 June 2019 dismissed' 'Plaintiff to pay the costs of the defendant on this application' 'Order for possession made by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal on 30 July 2018 is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment