Roberts v Scutts [2005] NSWSC 1220

Roberts v Scutts [2005] NSWSC 1220

The defendant warranted that the company's accounts, liabilities, creditors and tax obligations were properly disclosed, but undisclosed outstanding tax liabilities and creditors totalling $123,714.78 existed at about settlement. That conduct was misleading or deceptive under s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) and s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), and was a clear breach of the agreement and express warranties, entitling the plaintiff to judgment for that amount.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Claim for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Breach of Contract Arising From Sale of a Share in a Corporation / Ex Tempore Judgment; Defendant Did Not Appear
Outcome
Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff; cross-claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'sale of Share in Corporation' 'breach of Express Warranty by Vendor' 'undisclosed Company Liabilities']
['trade Practices' 'fair Trading' 'contract'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'sale of Share in Corporation' 'breach of Express Warranty by Vendor' 'undisclosed Company Liabilities']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Claim for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Breach of Contract Arising From Sale of a Share in a Corporation / Ex Tempore Judgment; Defendant Did Not Appear

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct by failing to disclose outstanding GST, PAYG tax, superannuation guarantee, income tax and creditor liabilities of the company before selling his share to the plaintiff.' "Whether the defendant breached express warranties in the share sale agreement concerning the company's accounts, liabilities, tax returns, creditors and taxation obligations." 'Whether the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the undisclosed liabilities discovered after settlement.']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant warranted that the company's accounts, liabilities, creditors and tax obligations were properly disclosed, but undisclosed outstanding tax liabilities and creditors totalling $123,714.78 existed at about settlement. That conduct was misleading or deceptive under s 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) and s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), and was a clear breach of the agreement and express warranties, entitling the plaintiff to judgment for that amount.

Court Disposition

Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff; cross-claim dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Verdict and judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $123,714.78.' 'The Defendant is to pay to the Plaintiff interest on the sum of $123,714.78 at the rate prescribed by Schedule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2005 from 1 November 2002 to 29 November 2005.' 'The Cross-Claim is dismissed.' "The Defendant is to pay...