Colman v The Owners Strata Plan No. 61131 (No. 2) [2023] NSWCATCD 101
Costs are awarded to the respondent on the ordinary basis as the amount claimed exceeded $30,000 and there is no basis to depart from the usual rule; the unsuccessful party pays costs. Indemnity costs are not justified given the conduct of the litigation and refusal of the settlement offer did not meet the threshold for unreasonable refusal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gary Mark Colman; Respondent: The Owners-Strata Plan No 61131; Respondent: Grace Lawyers
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs awarded against applicant; oral hearing on costs dispensed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Consumer and Commercial Division, Strata Schemes Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Mark Colman
Applicant
The Owners-Strata Plan No 61131
Respondent
Grace Lawyers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded and on what basis (ordinary or indemnity)
- 2 Application of r 38 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW)
- 3 Whether there were special circumstances or disentitling conduct to deprive the successful party of costs
Ratio Decidendi
Costs are awarded to the respondent on the ordinary basis as the amount claimed exceeded $30,000 and there is no basis to depart from the usual rule; the unsuccessful party pays costs. Indemnity costs are not justified given the conduct of the litigation and refusal of the settlement offer did not meet the threshold for unreasonable refusal.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded against applicant; oral hearing on costs dispensed
Orders
- An oral hearing on the issue of costs is dispensed with under s 50 (2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
- Gary Mark Colman is to pay the costs of The Owners Strata Plan No 61131 in Matter SC 21/39322 as agreed or assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation (as set out in s 3A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW)).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment