In Re Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) ACN 089 347 562 [2005] NSWSC 392
The compromise involved claims due by active defendants to the company in liquidation and therefore engaged s 477(2A). Having regard to the liquidator's commercial judgment, the benefits to creditors and employees, the risks of further litigation and appeal, the financial uncertainty of a defendant, and the prospect...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Act Application by Liquidator for Approval and Directions to Enter Into a Compromise / Summons Heard Instanter
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the liquidator to enter into the compromise; orders made in terms of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the summons.
- Legal Topics
- ['liquidator Powers' 'court Approval of Compromise' 'compromise of Debts to Company' 'agreement by Liquidator Exceeding Three Months' 'directions to Liquidator']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Act Application by Liquidator for Approval and Directions to Enter Into a Compromise / Summons Heard Instanter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed compromise engaged s 477(2A) of the Corporations Act 2001 as a compromise of claims or debts to the company.' 'Whether the Court should approve the liquidator causing the company to enter into the Deed of Settlement under ss 477(2A) and 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001.' 'Whether a direction should be given under s 479(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 authorising the liquidator to cause the company to enter into the compromise.']
Ratio Decidendi
The compromise involved claims due by active defendants to the company in liquidation and therefore engaged s 477(2A). Having regard to the liquidator's commercial judgment, the benefits to creditors and employees, the risks of further litigation and appeal, the financial uncertainty of a defendant, and the prospect that settlement would allow the long-running liquidation to be finalised, the Deed of Settlement was appropriate for approval under ss 477(2A) and 477(2B), and for a direction under s 479(3).
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the liquidator to enter into the compromise; orders made in terms of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the summons.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Ltd (in liquidation) to file a summons initialled and dated 1 April 2005 and an affidavit by Mr Steven John Sherman made on 1 April 2005.' 'The summons was ordered to be heard instanter.' 'The undertaking by Clayton Utz to pay the usual court filing fees on filing of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment