Kengike & anor v Bale [2017] NSWLEC 1353
The Court was not satisfied, based on evidence and expert assessment, that the tree is likely in the near future to cause damage or injury to the applicants’ property or any person, and therefore the Court's jurisdiction is not enlivened and the application must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute (class 2) / Hearing and Determination (final Orders)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['disputes Between Neighbours' 'tree Disputes' 'remedies for Nuisance and Damage From Trees']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute (class 2) / Hearing and Determination (final Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the tree has caused, is causing, or is likely in the near future to cause damage to property or injury to persons under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied, based on evidence and expert assessment, that the tree is likely in the near future to cause damage or injury to the applicants’ property or any person, and therefore the Court's jurisdiction is not enlivened and the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment