Farrell v Gray [2010] NSWSC 784
The late stage of proceedings, issues of finality, and the potential prejudice and increased costs to defendants outweigh possible benefits of further amendment. Relief under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act cannot affect registered mortgagees acting in good faith without notice. The amendments sought after substantial judgment and findings, as well as after court warnings about practical difficulties, are too late and would not achieve useful relief.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Post Substantive Judgment; Determination of Amendment Applications and Costs
- Outcome
- Dismissal of portion of claim under s 37A and amendment application; partial adverse costs orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'finality' 'costs' 'fraudulent Conveyance' 'contempt']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Post Substantive Judgment; Determination of Amendment Applications and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend Statement of Claim after substantive judgment' 'Whether relief under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 should be allowed' 'Costs arising from amendment motions and contempt proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The late stage of proceedings, issues of finality, and the potential prejudice and increased costs to defendants outweigh possible benefits of further amendment. Relief under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act cannot affect registered mortgagees acting in good faith without notice. The amendments sought after substantial judgment and findings, as well as after court warnings about practical difficulties, are too late and would not achieve useful relief.
Court Disposition
Dismissal of portion of claim under s 37A and amendment application; partial adverse costs orders.
Orders
- ['Dismiss that part of Statement of Claim seeking relief under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919.' 'No order as to costs of either party of the s 37A part of proceedings.' 'Dismiss the application of 3 May 2010 of the plaintiff (to amend Statement of Claim).' 'Order plaintiff to pay one-third of the costs of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment